Theorem

Darjeeling’s Theorem of Irrelevance

Theorem #1
We are traveling at the speed of light. Einstein either did not know this or he was afraid to tell us. We therefore become the e in the equation e = mc squared. The summation of all the e’s is cosmiosis or the cosmic constant.

Theorem #2
Time is a function of distance: t(d) such that as d approaches infinity, t approaches 0 or the null set. As Bob Weir of the Grateful Dead once said “The faster I go, the rounder I get.” Or to put it another way: The farther I travel, the faster I go. We already know that time is relevant to position, therefore if your position is irrelevant, so is time. Time is merely a convenient method of cosmic bookkeeping.

Theorem #3
There is no such thing as order. There is only a varying degree of chaos. The degree to which chaos exists depends on the fractal boundary between entities. Entities can be physical, spatial, psychological, or cultural. Boundaries can be nebulous or dramatic; and even the most seemingly rigid boundaries are in a constant state of flux.

Notes on Theorem #1

Consider that astronomers have measured the speed of galaxies at the known edge of the universe. First of all, the “edge of the universe” does not represent a boundary between universe and non-universe but between known and unknown. This boundary is a psychological and physical fractal boundary that is in flux. It is psychological in that it represents the degree to which we are able to comprehend and create methods of measurement that verify our comprehension. It is a mental construct of a physical entity. It is a physical boundary in that the galaxies and solid matter that are known to exist near us are used as cosmic markers that agree with our mental construct and are logically asserted in the form of “such as these are, so it must be with respect to the boundary.” The physical boundary moves in what appears to be a solid line that is receding from us in every direction. As our capability to comprehend and measure the boundary increases, so does the distance from ourselves to the boundary, and likewise, the speed at which the boundary recedes from us. However, it should be apparent that, rather than drawing a straight line from galaxy to galaxy as those exist at the very edge, linear regression analysis shows that this straight-line concept is merely a useful analytical tool. The true boundary is fractal in nature, obeying, or disobeying if you will, only chaotic existential tendencies. (Existential, in this instance, refers to simultaneous existence and non-existence.)

Astronomical analysis of the velocity at which the fractal boundary is moving indicates only a red shift in the spectral analysis with a value for this velocity at approximately “c”, the speed of light. There are no measurements either “ahead”, “behind”, or “laterally” that indicate a blue shift that would mean that a galaxy (and therefore the fractal boundary) is approaching or traveling at the same velocity as we are. So, if we pick any particular “edge galaxy” and assign it a velocity value, we fall into the microcosmic particle vs. wave argument. We also set up the Ptolemaic centrist cosmological system that serves to define and reiterate our position.

So, let us then redefine our position, that is to say the position of our own galaxy, to be at the fractal boundary and that, positioning ourselves at a point equally far away as we now are from the perceived edge of the universe, we are able to take measurements of our now perceived distant position and velocity. We would then find that our galaxy, too, obeys the parameters of our own system and that we are moving away from our current measurement position at approximately the speed of light.

How did Einstein come up with the idea of squaring the speed of light? This is purely a mathematical construct. Or is it? The idea of a physical entity approaching the speed of light is all that we usually consider when we contemplate his theories. But what about velocities that exceed the speed of light and the overwhelming function of the speed of light multiplied by itself in this equation?

BLOWOUTS IN TIME AND SPACE

Physical entities traveling in excess of the speed of light exist within our own cosmological construction. Einstein and others defined these as black holes. In reality, these warps in the cosmic weave are the residue of galaxies at the “edge of the universe” which are traveling away from us in excess of the speed of light. As we point our measuring devices and systems directly at these receding galaxies, the results of our measurements exceed our known existential parameters and thus we perceive a blow-out of the cosmic fabric. It should follow that the true “edge of the universe” would be where no black holes are found to exist. Whenever we detect a black hole, we are then assured that we have potential measurements in excess of the speed of light. Currently we are not able to arrive at the true value of these velocities because there are no reference points from which to begin or end our measurements. (One method in observing and measuring the recession speed of black holes would be to use a mathematical construct of galactic triangulation where simultaneous measurement from two galaxies could pinpoint position and velocity.) To reiterate, we have already discovered astronomical entities that are traveling in excess of the speed of light, but we have yet to measure one accurately to prove this phenomenon. The physical mass characteristic of galaxies and matter in general (i.e. all physical matter, us included), then yields Einstein’s equation and we, along with all physical matter, equate with pure energy.

THE COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT

To look for the cosmological constant in the realm of gravitation as we now understand it is a mistake. That would be like saying that a particle of sand is the constant factor in defining a beach. Gravity as the progenitor of the cosmological constant is an oversimplification of our understanding of the cosmos in that it is an attempt to place that understanding in terms of particle physics. Rather, it would be more appropriate to direct our efforts at determining the cosmological constant within the realm of physical matter as its velocity exceeds the speed of light and it ceases to become particulate matter. For those who would continue the argument that “nothing can exceed the speed of light” we only have to look again at Einstein’s famous equation, E=mc2, to see that there is no limit to the speed of light when it is used in reference both mathematically and physically to define and describe pure energy. In order to comprehend the existential state of this energy, our comprehension of the concept of energy as a cataclysmic event (i.e. mushroom cloud) must be refined to account for lower level states of energy that are spread over the vastness of the universe. We therefore perceive of two levels of comprehension for the phenomenon of energy: (1) Cataclysmic energy on the macro scale, and (2) Primordial energy on the micro scale. An example of Cataclysmic energy would be a supernova. An example of Primordial energy would be the dissolution of physical matter through its acceleration in excess of the speed of light and its subsequent distribution onto the background of the universe. The total energy in the cosmological system remains constant through a continuing process of dissolution and redistribution. The background energy along with the absence of it, is the cosmological constant and is available for whatever processes may occur and act upon it. Recreation of matter then becomes relevant and the constant state of energy redistribution fulfills the cosmic process of stellar generation and disintegration. However, this system is “structured” in a totally chaotic and random manner so that the process is everending.

Notes on Theorem #2

Consider your birthday celebration and think about where you are. (It helps if you visualize the time and place where you were born.) Each year at the time of day when you were born, you reach the same point in the Earth’s orbit where you began. (I call it Point Alpha). Years are therefore a construct of distance as are hours, minutes, nanoseconds, and so forth. Velocity is also a construct of distance as a representation of spatial relevance. It would be just as appropriate to say (when asked how old you are), “Oh, I have traveled 80 trillion miles,” and let the person that asked do the math. This reminds me also of the traveler to Mexico who, when asked how old he was replied, “Yo tengo 54 anos,” pronouncing the word “anos” without using the proper morph (n with tilde=enya). He had just made the statement that he had 54 assholes instead of 54 years. Using the distance attribute of the time construct would have avoided this linguistic mistake.

Note on Thorem #3

JELLY BEANS AND RAINBOWS

Consider two jars of jelly beans. In one jar all of the jelly beans have been segregated and placed in the jar in layers and in an orderly fashion based on color. The jelly beans that have been picked represent only the colors of a rainbow, the intent being to put them in connection with a greater physical structure other than being mere randomly selected jelly beans. In the other jar, jelly beans have been poured in out of a bag with no respect to color or distribution. Which jar best represents order and which best represents chaos? The jellies in the first jar are screaming with chaos, resisting not only the layered structure, but also the color selection. The rainbow parameter also creates a higher level of cosmic excitement in that if either the color or the layered structure is changed, there is a direct relationship to the structure of rainbows in general and a consequent flux in energy throughout the local universe. The local universe must readjust and reaffirm the “true nature” of its own reality with respect to the way things really are with respect to jelly beans and rainbows. The jellies in the other jar rest peacefully in random chaotic order. Picking one jelly bean out of the second jar does nothing to establish chaos or another random order other than the mathematical factor of -1. Neither does adding more jelly beans even if you use a mathematical factor of +1 or +infinity. You can literally reach to the bottom of the jar and pick a jelly bean without disturbing the chaotic constant. The very last jelly bean in the jar is still representative of the original jelly bean structure.